目的 Purpose
為了創造一個透明且理性的溝通環境。
To create a transparent, rational communication environment.
使說謊、情緒脅迫與錯誤資訊更加困難。
To make lying, emotional coercion, and misinformation much harder.
主要原則 Key Principles
語言誠信
所有公開陳述必須可追溯且可驗證。
標示為「真實」的陳述，說話者須對其事實正確性負法律責任。
Linguistic Integrity
All public statements must be traceable and verifiable.
The speaker is held legally responsible for the factual accuracy of statements labeled as “truth.”
情緒標示
任何帶有強烈情緒訴求的內容必須明確標示（例如：意見、推測、諷刺）。
避免將說服偽裝成事實。
Emotional Labeling
Any content with strong emotional appeals must be explicitly tagged (e.g., opinion, speculation,
satire).
This prevents people from disguising persuasion as fact.
語言責任
公眾人物、教育者與媒體必須聲明訊息的目的。
不遵守者可能受到罰款、停播或吊銷執照等處分。
Language Responsibility
Public figures, educators, and media must declare the intended purpose of their messages.Failure to comply can result in penalties, such as fines, suspension of broadcasting, or
revocation of licenses.
文明論辯
線上與線下討論必須遵守尊重語言的標準。
嚴格規範仇恨言論、操弄或故意模糊。
Civil Discourse Enforcement
Online and offline discussions must adhere to a standard of respectful language.
Hate speech, manipulation, or deliberate ambiguity are strictly regulated.
支持者說 Supporters say
「這是文明首次建立保衛真相與理性對話的框架。」
“It’s the first time civilization has created a framework to defend truth and rational dialogue.”
批評者說 Critics say
「這是語言威權主義，壓制自由表達與自然情感。」
“It’s a form of language authoritarianism that suppresses free expression and natural
emotion.”
文化影響 Cultural Impact
此法案改變政治、媒體、教育，甚至個人關係。
The Act transforms politics, media, education, and even personal relationships.
許多第五太陽紀時代的國家採用或禁止此法案，引發全球關於語言控制範圍的辯論
發表迴響